![]() The Tessla audio plugin series once started as a reminiscence to classic. So even if I might prefer the sound of one (not that I have good ears anyway), I think the usability was actually more important, as they all sound good in their own way. TesslaSE mkII Analog goodness in subtle doses. another example of favoring faithfulness to design limits/flaws over modern usability). (one very minor gripe with the Focusrite is the multi-stage button workflow in the comp/gate filter section. another stupid UI flaw that so many plugin devs seem to love including! Of the four, the Focusrite gate me acceptable results in the quickest and most painless manner. ![]() The N just felt cramped and hard to read, especially with shadows from the knobs actually obscuring some of the labels. I don't want the option for 3 EQs and 2 compressors if I did, I wouldn't be using a channel strip in the first place. Ce site utilise des cookies pour ameliorer lexpérience utilisateur. This website uses cookies to improve user experience. Psyscope Multi-track synced oscilloscope. And the 50 was a bit too flexible for me. Psylab Kick bass cubic bezier synthesizer. That alone was enough to make me not enjoy using it. They make the plugin harder to use, and make it harder to read the settings on first glance. The 80 has those stupid concentric knobs, that I'm sure are great in hardware but are simply awful for a computer GUI. I ended up going with the Focusrite in the end because it felt the easiest to use. I demoed the Lindell 50 and 80, the Console N, and the Focusrite. I also like Wavearts' Trackplug as I'm a sucker for making EQ moves on a full, graphically-represented parametric. ![]() I went with the Focusrite based almost solely (Well, knowing the sound of most plugs these days is top-notch) on how spacious and well laid out it is. But if it's as cramped and fiddly as some of the earlier PA emulations, that could be a barrier to use. These are plugs that might find their way onto every track. Also, don't discount the importance of (G)UI. These chosen curves can make 'magic' happen, depending on the source (Why it's worth considering more than one), and within very quick, broad moves. Many emulations will keep to the same limits/restrictions of the original models e.g when using limited and very specific frequency adjustments. While there's certainly a case to be made for a small handful, or perhaps a switchable strip such as the Waves Omni, I'd advise to just choose on the basis of which gets out of your way and lets you dial in the sound you like the easiest. It would be different if you were comparing a specific emulation offered by various companies, because in these cases at least the assumption is an emulation of the same EQ curves, same compression algo's etc. There are just too many confounding variables.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |